Showing posts with label Ready for C1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ready for C1. Show all posts

Ready for C1 p 20 . Past and Perfect Tenses. Speaking. Monologue Sample Answer. Cloze

 


 

A. Interaction

1.Have you ever been abroad? If so, what special difficulties did you experience?

2. What ambitions have you harboured? Have you ever thought they would be too great to fulfil? Have you ever given up any ambitions you had? What were the reasons?

3. Do you usually go out for dinner or lunch? How often do you do it?

4. Did your parents use to read you a story at bedtime? If so, what stories do you remember them telling you? Do you think this is something positive? Do bedtime stories encourage people to read later in life?

5. When you were a little child, did your parents let you watch everything on TV? What kind of programmes or films were you NOT allowed to watch? Do you remember any films in particular?

B. Monologue

Partner A

1. Have you been learning new vocabulary this week? What new words have you learnt so far?

2. Is this the first time you have attended an Advanced English course?

3. Where have you been eating during the summer? What healthy meals have you been cooking at home?

Partner B

1. Would you rather the English grammar was easier than it is? 

2. Would you sooner study online than face-to-face?

3. Would you rather have worked than come to class?



Monologue sample answer:


1. Would society sooner adopt fully remote schooling or maintain a blended, flexible approach to education? 

2. This is probably the first time in history that multiple generations have had to adapt to such rapid technological change simultaneously. What challenges has this created? 

3. By the time young people finish university today, what skills will they have been developing that previous generations had largely ignored?


Introduction

When considering the future of education, it's clear that we're at a real crossroads. The experiences of the past few years have fundamentally challenged our assumptions (1)______________ how learning should take place, and it's necessary to consider not just what's technologically possible, but what's actually beneficial for students and society as a (2)___________.

Question 1

From an educational perspective, most people would prefer to keep some form of face-to-face interaction in schools and universities rather than moving everything online permanently. You see, whilst the pandemic forced us into remote learning almost overnight, it's become increasingly clear that this wasn't the educational revolution some (3)_____________ been predicting. In fact, what became apparent was that students were constantly complaining about feeling isolated and disconnected from their peers. Teachers, too, had been struggling to maintain engagement when they couldn't gauge students' understanding and reactions in the way they (4)_____________ to.

For many educators, this was the first time they (5)____________ ever taught an entire course online, and the learning curve was extremely steep. Some schools had been investing in digital infrastructure for years, but even so, nothing could have fully prepared them for such an abrupt transition. (6)_______________ said that, there's unlikely to be a complete return to pre-pandemic practices. It's now several years (7)____________ distance learning became commonplace, and valuable lessons about flexibility have been learnt. For instance, students who used to spend hours commuting can now attend some sessions from home, (8)____________ has actually improved attendance rates in many institutions.

Question 2

This leads to another important consideration. (9)____________ makes this period in history particularly remarkable is that we're witnessing something quite unprecedented – people of all ages, from schoolchildren to their grandparents, have been forced to embrace new digital tools at the same time. This simultaneous transformation across age groups has certainly created some unique obstacles.

On the one hand, younger people have generally been finding it easier to adapt – after (10)_____________, they've been using tablets and smartphones since they were toddlers. On the other hand, older generations have had to completely rethink the way they'd been doing things for decades. Research suggests that many experienced teachers would have preferred their schools to have provided more comprehensive training before expecting staff to conduct lessons on Zoom. It was a long time since many educators (11)___________ last felt so professionally challenged by technological change. Many had been planning to finish their careers using traditional methods they'd always relied on, and suddenly everything changed. Several training programmes (12)____________ to have taken place in March 2020, but they were cancelled when the first lockdown began, which left many teachers feeling inadequately prepared.

What's (13)_____________, this rapid transformation has exposed a significant digital divide. Not everyone has had access to reliable internet or appropriate devices, which means that some students have been falling behind through no fault of their own. Before the pandemic, these inequalities had been less visible because everyone was physically present in the classroom. Research indicates that many families would (14)_______________ have kept their children in traditional classrooms where at least the playing field was more level.

Question 3

Looking ahead, it's fascinating to consider the capabilities that today's university leavers are acquiring. The competencies they've been gaining throughout their studies are remarkably different from what earlier cohorts concentrated on. (15)________________ previous generations had focused primarily on memorising information and following established procedures, modern students have been learning to think critically, collaborate remotely, and adapt to constant change.

For example, digital literacy has become absolutely fundamental. Students have been using online research tools, managing their digital presence, and communicating across various platforms in ways that (16)_____________ have been unimaginable just twenty years ago. Similarly, soft skills like resilience and flexibility have become increasingly important. The fact of the matter is, these young people have been navigating unprecedented disruption throughout their education, which has actually taught them to cope with uncertainty far better than previous generations (17)_______________ to.

Moreover, they've been developing what's often referred to as 'learning agility' – the ability to teach themselves new skills quickly. This is crucial because, it's clear that many of the jobs they'll be doing in ten years' time probably don't even exist (18)________________. By the time they graduate, they will have been adapting to new technologies and working methods for their entire educational journey, which is something no previous generation experienced to the same extent.

Conclusion

To summarise, evidence suggests we're heading towards a hybrid educational model that combines the best of both traditional and digital approaches. Whilst the rapid technological transformation has undoubtedly created obstacles, particularly for older age groups, it has also equipped young people (19)___________ a unique set of capabilities that will serve them well in an increasingly unpredictable world. The key consideration is ensuring that no one is left (20)_____________ in this transition and that human connection continues to be valued alongside technological innovation.



KEY





1. about





2. whole






3. had





4. used





5. had





6. Having





7. since






8. which





9. What






10. all




11. had





12. were





13. more






14. sooner/rather/





15. Whilst/ While





16. would





17. used





18. yet





19. with






20. behind


Ready for C1 p 22. Berlin Wall. NPR. Listening.

1989: Remembering the Fall of the Berlin Wall

November 8, 2009 marked the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. On the streets that November night in 1989, Germans celebrated the demise of the barrier, but had no way of knowing what political and cultural fallout would follow. On NPR All Things Considered Host Guy Raz recaps the events from 20 years ago and talks with Mary Sarotte, author of 1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe, about the fall of the wall and what came after.

 

GUY RAZ, host:

This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Guy Raz.

On this day 20 years ago, our world was ordered into three __________ - the West and the countries aligned with the United States, the Eastern Bloc and its allies under the Soviet Union, and the ____________ movement, which included countries like India.

Now, that world order had begun to ___________ years before 1989. Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev ____________ his perestroika policy in 1987. There was the solidarity movement in Poland, and in the Baltic states, people were openly challenging Russian influence. And all of these movements seem to find expression in Berlin the night of November 9th, 1989.

Unidentified Woman: It's a great day for Berlin and for all German people. The __________ is finally opened

Unidentified Man #1: There are thousands of people here in front of the wall at the Brandenburg Gate at this hour. The West Berlin police are keeping the crowd away from the wall but the sense of excitement is ____________.

Unidentified Man #2: This just in to the newsroom: Associated Press is reporting that East Germany has thrown all of its border open to its citizens to travel anywhere they wish.

RAZ: November 9th happens to be a ___________ date in German history. In 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated. In 1923, the fledgling Nazi movement, under the young Adolph Hitler, attempted a _________ in Munich. And in 1938, the Nazis ordered an anti-Jewish pogrom known as Kristallnacht.

But there was nothing planned for 1989 - it was an accident of history. For months, East Germans had been ___________ protests calling for economic and political liberalization. The night of November 9th, an inexperienced East German spokesman announced that travel restrictions would soon be relaxed. When will that begin, asked a reporter?

The spokesman, Gunter Schabowski, __________ his papers and said _____________, immediately. And so over the next few hours, East and West Berliners began to gather on opposite sides of the wall.

 

 

KEY

GUY RAZ, host:

This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Guy Raz.

On this day 20 years ago, our world was ordered into three spheres - the West and the countries aligned with the United States, the Eastern Bloc and its allies under the Soviet Union, and the  

 

 

 

non-aligned movement, which included countries like India.

Now, that world order had begun to 

 

 

 

unravel years before 1989. Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev 

 

 

 

unveiled his perestroika policy in 1987. There was the solidarity movement in Poland, and in the Baltic states, people were openly challenging Russian influence. And all of these movements seem to find expression in Berlin the night of November 9th, 1989.

Unidentified Woman: It's a great day for Berlin and for all German people. The 

 

 

 

border is finally opened

Unidentified Man #1: There are thousands of people here in front of the wall at the Brandenburg Gate at this hour. The West Berlin police are keeping the crowd away from the wall but the sense of excitement is  

 

 

 

undeniable.

Unidentified Man #2: This just in to the newsroom: Associated Press is reporting that East Germany has thrown all of its border open to its citizens to travel anywhere they wish.

RAZ: November 9th happens to be a 

 

 

 

pivotal date in German history. In 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated. In 1923, the fledgling Nazi movement, under the young Adolph Hitler, attempted a 

 

 

 

coup in Munich. And in 1938, the Nazis ordered an anti-Jewish pogrom known as Kristallnacht.

But there was nothing planned for 1989 - it was an accident of history. For months, East Germans had been  

 

 

 

mounting protests calling for economic and political liberalization. The night of November 9th, an inexperienced East German spokesman announced that travel restrictions would soon be relaxed. When will that begin, asked a reporter?

The spokesman, Gunter Schabowski,  

 

 

 

fumbled his papers and said  

 

 

 

offhandedly, immediately. And so over the next few hours, East and West Berliners began to gather on opposite sides of the wall.

 

Historian Mary Sarotte picks it up from here.

Professor MARY SAROTTE (International Relations, University of Southern California; Author, "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe"): The individual border guards decided that once 20,000 people showed up, they had no alternative but to open the border because they would just be overwhelmed. So, this actually happens for the first time at the Bornholmer Street crossing at about 11:30 p.m., and that is the end of the division of Germany.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte is the author of "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe." She explains that leaders on both sides of the iron curtain were caught by surprise.

West German Chancellor Helmut Cole was in Warsaw; Mikhail Gorbachev was asleep in Moscow. And President George H.W. Bush in Washington reacted soberly. Aren't you excited, asked a reporter? I'm just not an emotional kind of guy, Mr. Bush said.

Prof. SAROTTE: That was a moment where what President George H.W. Bush was doing was right on substance, which is to say he didn't want to in any way make an already volatile situation more volatile, so he was trying to be calm and show restraint. But the problem is that it was also a moment of great celebration and he missed acknowledging that in his remarks.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte, when did it become clear, how long after the events of November 9th, 1989 - did it become clear that the Federal Republic of Germany, West Germany, and the GDR, East Germany, would unify?

Prof. SAROTTE: It was not immediately apparent. Indeed, the first thing Chancellor Helmut Cole did was announce that there should be a confederation of West Germany and East Germany. And then over some longer period of time, he and his aides guessed internally that it will be a minimum of a decade but probably a lot more that the two Germanys would gradually merge.

What happens is that it becomes apparent that the East Germans are not happy with that outcome. And when Helmut Cole goes to East Germany in December 1989 to give a speech, he's just overwhelmed by the desire for national unity. And he realizes, wait a minute, I actually can be the chancellor of German unity, and decides to push very, very quickly for rapid German unity. And he enjoys the very strong support of George H.W. Bush.

RAZ: Washington also saw it as an opportunity to expand NATO. That riled the Soviets. How did they manage to convince Mikhail Gorbachev that this was going to work out?

Prof. SAROTTE: Well, basically with a lot of money.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Prof. SAROTTE: Robert Gates, who at this time was at the National Security Council - of course, he's now the defense secretary - was very clear about this in him memoir. He said we were trying to bribe the Soviets out of East Germany. And so basically at the end of 1990, Helmut Cole agrees to give a very large sum of credits and other forms of support to Mikhail Gorbachev, and in return, Gorbachev agrees that the Soviet troops will leave East Germany and that the united Germany will be able to go into NATO.

RAZ: Now, of course, not everybody was in favor of this united Germany, particularly Britain's Margaret Thatcher and France's Francois Mitterrand.

Prof. SAROTTE: Yes. They are two very interesting characters. Both Margaret Thatcher and Francois Mitterrand were very surprised when the wall came down and initially, very, very anxious. But Francois Mitterrand realizes fairly early in 1990 that the smart move is to get on board with German unification, since it's coming, and see what percentage there is for France in it.

Thatcher has a bit of a more emotional reaction (unintelligible).

RAZ: She initially calls it an (unintelligible) - dry comparisons between the Nazi unification of Germany and Austria in 1938.

Prof. SAROTTE: It's interesting though when you look at Thatcher. But she had at least three good reasons for worrying about rapid German unification. And history has borne(ph) her out on these.

Her first worry is that driving forward too quickly to German unification would weaken Gorbachev's position at home. And she felt very strongly that Gorbachev was the best possible leader of the Soviet Union from the Western point of view.

Secondly, she worried about the long-term economic consequences, both within Germany but for Europe as a whole of rapid fire unification, funded largely by West German borrowing. And there was a currency crisis, a severe currency crisis in 1992 with dramatic consequences for the British pound that shows that these were not unwarranted concerns.

And third and finally, she speculates internally if the Germans start changing borders in Europe, then we have to worry about Yugoslavia. And tragically, history showed that she was right in that regard as well. So, Thatcher actually had some substantive reasons for worrying about German unification on top of just an emotional reaction.

RAZ: At the beginning of 1989, would anybody have predicted that the end of the year would have brought about the collapse of communism, the beginnings of the collapse of communism?

Prof. SAROTTE: I doubt that very much. I think that it was clear that the long-term trend was downward. But if you said that at the end of the year the wall will be down, I think people would have thought you were crazy.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte is a professor of international relations at USC and the author of the new book, "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe."

Professor Sarotte, thank you so much.

Prof. SAROTTE: Thank you very much.

RAZ: And one quick question before we let you go.

Prof. SAROTTE: Sure.

RAZ: I've heard that the man who really brought down the wall was David Hasselhoff. Any truth to that?

(Soundbite of laughter)

Prof. SAROTTE: No comment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KEY

GUY RAZ, host:

This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Guy Raz.

On this day 20 years ago, our world was ordered into three spheres - the West and the countries aligned with the United States, the Eastern Bloc and its allies under the Soviet Union, and the non-aligned movement, which included countries like India.

Now, that world order had begun to unravel years before 1989. Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his perestroika policy in 1987. There was the solidarity movement in Poland, and in the Baltic states, people were openly challenging Russian influence. And all of these movements seem to find expression in Berlin the night of November 9th, 1989.

Unidentified Woman: It's a great day for Berlin and for all German people. The border is finally opened

Unidentified Man #1: There are thousands of people here in front of the wall at the Brandenburg Gate at this hour. The West Berlin police are keeping the crowd away from the wall but the sense of excitement is undeniable.

Unidentified Man #2: This just in to the newsroom: Associated Press is reporting that East Germany has thrown all of its border open to its citizens to travel anywhere they wish.

RAZ: November 9th happens to be a pivotal date in German history. In 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm abdicated. In 1923, the fledgling Nazi movement, under the young Adolph Hitler, attempted a coup in Munich. And in 1938, the Nazis ordered an anti-Jewish pogrom known as Kristallnacht.

But there was nothing planned for 1989 - it was an accident of history. For months, East Germans had been mounting protests calling for economic and political liberalization. The night of November 9th, an inexperienced East German spokesman announced that travel restrictions would soon be relaxed. When will that begin, asked a reporter?

The spokesman, Gunter Schabowski, fumbled his papers and said offhandedly, immediately. And so over the next few hours, East and West Berliners began to gather on opposite sides of the wall.

 

Historian Mary Sarotte picks it up from here.

Professor MARY SAROTTE (International Relations, University of Southern California; Author, "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe"): The individual border guards decided that once 20,000 people showed up, they had no alternative but to open the border because they would just be overwhelmed. So, this actually happens for the first time at the Bornholmer Street crossing at about 11:30 p.m., and that is the end of the division of Germany.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte is the author of "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe." She explains that leaders on both sides of the iron curtain were caught by surprise.

West German Chancellor Helmut Cole was in Warsaw; Mikhail Gorbachev was asleep in Moscow. And President George H.W. Bush in Washington reacted soberly. Aren't you excited, asked a reporter? I'm just not an emotional kind of guy, Mr. Bush said.

Prof. SAROTTE: That was a moment where what President George H.W. Bush was doing was right on substance, which is to say he didn't want to in any way make an already volatile situation more volatile, so he was trying to be calm and show restraint. But the problem is that it was also a moment of great celebration and he missed acknowledging that in his remarks.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte, when did it become clear, how long after the events of November 9th, 1989 - did it become clear that the Federal Republic of Germany, West Germany, and the GDR, East Germany, would unify?

Prof. SAROTTE: It was not immediately apparent. Indeed, the first thing Chancellor Helmut Cole did was announce that there should be a confederation of West Germany and East Germany. And then over some longer period of time, he and his aides guessed internally that it will be a minimum of a decade but probably a lot more that the two Germanys would gradually merge.

What happens is that it becomes apparent that the East Germans are not happy with that outcome. And when Helmut Cole goes to East Germany in December 1989 to give a speech, he's just overwhelmed by the desire for national unity. And he realizes, wait a minute, I actually can be the chancellor of German unity, and decides to push very, very quickly for rapid German unity. And he enjoys the very strong support of George H.W. Bush.

RAZ: Washington also saw it as an opportunity to expand NATO. That riled the Soviets. How did they manage to convince Mikhail Gorbachev that this was going to work out?

Prof. SAROTTE: Well, basically with a lot of money.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Prof. SAROTTE: Robert Gates, who at this time was at the National Security Council - of course, he's now the defense secretary - was very clear about this in him memoir. He said we were trying to bribe the Soviets out of East Germany. And so basically at the end of 1990, Helmut Cole agrees to give a very large sum of credits and other forms of support to Mikhail Gorbachev, and in return, Gorbachev agrees that the Soviet troops will leave East Germany and that the united Germany will be able to go into NATO.

RAZ: Now, of course, not everybody was in favor of this united Germany, particularly Britain's Margaret Thatcher and France's Francois Mitterrand.

Prof. SAROTTE: Yes. They are two very interesting characters. Both Margaret Thatcher and Francois Mitterrand were very surprised when the wall came down and initially, very, very anxious. But Francois Mitterrand realizes fairly early in 1990 that the smart move is to get on board with German unification, since it's coming, and see what percentage there is for France in it.

Thatcher has a bit of a more emotional reaction (unintelligible).

RAZ: She initially calls it an (unintelligible) - dry comparisons between the Nazi unification of Germany and Austria in 1938.

Prof. SAROTTE: It's interesting though when you look at Thatcher. But she had at least three good reasons for worrying about rapid German unification. And history has borne(ph) her out on these.

Her first worry is that driving forward too quickly to German unification would weaken Gorbachev's position at home. And she felt very strongly that Gorbachev was the best possible leader of the Soviet Union from the Western point of view.

Secondly, she worried about the long-term economic consequences, both within Germany but for Europe as a whole of rapid fire unification, funded largely by West German borrowing. And there was a currency crisis, a severe currency crisis in 1992 with dramatic consequences for the British pound that shows that these were not unwarranted concerns.

And third and finally, she speculates internally if the Germans start changing borders in Europe, then we have to worry about Yugoslavia. And tragically, history showed that she was right in that regard as well. So, Thatcher actually had some substantive reasons for worrying about German unification on top of just an emotional reaction.

RAZ: At the beginning of 1989, would anybody have predicted that the end of the year would have brought about the collapse of communism, the beginnings of the collapse of communism?

Prof. SAROTTE: I doubt that very much. I think that it was clear that the long-term trend was downward. But if you said that at the end of the year the wall will be down, I think people would have thought you were crazy.

RAZ: Mary Sarotte is a professor of international relations at USC and the author of the new book, "1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe."

Professor Sarotte, thank you so much.

Prof. SAROTTE: Thank you very much.

RAZ: And one quick question before we let you go.

Prof. SAROTTE: Sure.

RAZ: I've heard that the man who really brought down the wall was David Hasselhoff. Any truth to that?

(Soundbite of laughter)

Prof. SAROTTE: No comment